Been two years since I last tried to do the DJ thing. Here's the latest. I need to practice but perhaps you'll enjoy.
Thursday, February 4, 2021
Sunday, December 13, 2020
The Fit Test
So I determined that if I want to PR in my next race I would need to run 12 miles in 1.5 hours. That would be a 45 min 6 miler. I was going to run a 10k just to see if I could hit the 45 but then I thought about it. In the race I would be running 13.1 miles. Testing myself at 6 miles with fresh legs will tell me nothing about what I can do after 8-10 miles. So I decided on a 12 mile test run. And I had to run it in such a way that I felt that I could run the next 1.1 miles at at least the average pace of the 12 miles. After all, if I burnt myself out and had to walk the last mile, the effort of the previous 12 miles would be undone.
Mother nature blessed me with a day in the mid 50s, light breeze (my planned race will likely be breezy so this was a good thing) and plenty of sunshine.
Time?
1:28:40
Pace 7:21/mile
9 seconds per mile faster than planned. Included stopping to kick a ball back to some volleyball players and a relatively slow start due to fumbling with my phone.
And unlike last March, my heart rate never approached max. Which means there was plenty in the tank for the last mile and to drop some seconds in the second half.
With the upcoming winter training, these numbers should improve by March.
The one disappointment is my cadence. It's way too low for what I want to do. There is definitely some efficiency work that I need to do.
Saturday, December 5, 2020
$60 Carbon Plate? Yes Please
So after watching a YouTube video by a runner who went to various discount stores to score running sneakers, I decided to make the same trip. What did I locate? Well the first score as a Boston 8, in blue. There were a lot of pink ones. Sorry, I don't do pink shoes. Period. Stop with that. Those were $35. When I purchased my first pair last spring I paid way more than that.
So I decided to see what else was out there and I ran across the following:
Yeah, it's "old" tech when compared to the current Nike offerings but:
1) I'm not being paid to run
2) I'm not being paid to review sneakers on YouTube.
Also, while carbon plate shoes will give you some extra speed, the fact of the matter is that running efficiency and training is what's responsible for most of your performance. You gotta do the work. Period.
But back to the sneaker. $60. For a carbon plate shoe. This originally retailed for $130. Why would I pay that? However; one of the problems with this shoe showed up rather quickly. After a 5 miler to see how they feel, the sole was already showing signs of wear. Clearly then I cannot do any kind of regular running with it. The plan now is to buy another pair and reserve them for racing days ONLY.
Word is that you should NOT wear these things regularly because it will change your gait. I don't know how true that is but I don't plan on wearing these for anything less than a fit tests and speedwork.
Also, these people were not lying about how stiff these things are. You cannot bend this shoe at all. Also, turning doesn't inspire confidence. I'll be honest, it didn't feel much different from my current rotation. It's light like my Pegs and Bostons. They are high but I wasn't feeling the "it felt like it was pushing me" thing that I've watched and read. Maybe it's because they are "old" tech.
Anyway, assuming the Sham is not cancelled again (announcement on Dec 15), I'll probably run it in these. I was originally going to run in the Pegs but if these add a little bit I'll take it. Especially for $60.
Yes please.
Friday, November 13, 2020
And Now, We Fast
So last year I decided to train differently for the Shamrok-Anthem half marathon. That is I decided to train sanely. I took up MAF training and by late March, I saw results. It's now November and I'm seeing even more results. I'll probably be posting on that in the future as I hope these folks don't cancel the 2021 race via announcement in December. Anyway, I've added a new twist: Intermittent fasting.
One of the goals of the MAF training was to get my body to burn fat for fuel rather than sugar. You can go longer on fat than sugar so for a long distance race, this change would be very helpful. But the one thing I noticed is that I continue to carry a significant amount of abdominal fat. Now I'm not a spring chicken so I know that as we age we generally pack in fat but the thing is that for the amount of running and biking I do, it didn't make sense.
So I had to confess. I snack. Yes. Yes I do. So even though I eat sensible food, the snacking was undoing the gains, particularly the night snacking where since I'm not doing anything, the food is turned into fat for storage. I had to put a stop to this. Clearly will power was not going to work so I needed an incentive:
16-8 daily intermittent fasting.
Since I'm not actually trying to lose weight (I am, but very targetted) the idea here for me is not to reduce calories. For the amount of running I do it's not healthy. But to eliminate the extra eating by blocking off 16 hours. Basically, after dinner, there is no eating again until the next day whenever 16 hours is up.
Honestly, the worst part is the last 3 hours. And really the reason why is because generally, I'm not doing anything that takes attention away from the fact that I'm USED to eating by that time. I'm on week three and have dropped weight and actually can tell the difference between what I weigh when I've eaten and when my stomach is empty.
So far there have been no ill effects on my running, which I didn't expect there to be since I'm not on a starvation diet. I also make sure to take vitamins, etc. during the fast period because of my running and sweating out various elements.
Research says it takes about 3 to 5 weeks for your body to adjust to the schedule. I'm on the tail of week 3. We shall see.
Monday, September 28, 2020
The Swings Of The Game
Havent' posted much on BlackJack for obvious reasons. Casinos were closed and when they opened I sat it out for a while. Having returned, I have found conditions favorable. EV has gone up because less people can play at once. Yesterday I managed to snag a table to myself.
Wanted to post a graph showing the swings of the game. This is pretty typical of what I see when playing.
The x-axis is time from session start. As you see I had a two-hour session most of it consisted of being in the red. I had a particular goal in mind and a time limit. Knowing the swings when the goal was met, I got up which fortunately was near the end of the shoe, meaning I did not have to waste a positive count.
The reason I know the times is because I exit the game at any -1 count. That's when I record where I stand. So each increment shows me sitting out. You see that -1 counts happen quite frequently in the space of an hour (we had two 10 minutes apart, including the time waiting for a shuffle.
The takeaways from this post is that yes, there will be losing. In my prior experience, I was coming way underfunded for the expected dips. This can really negatively impact your game as you may never be able to recover to preserve your bankroll. So come prepared.
Secondly, if you are playing a positive expectation game you still need to learn to deal with losing and the higher your stakes the lower those dips will be. Do not panic and manage your stress and keep playing by the math.
Wednesday, September 16, 2020
Road To The Sham 2021: Back To Stability
So it's September and I'm back on the road to the March Shamrock Anthem Half Marathon in Virginia Beach. This means I'm back on the training horse but with some significant changes. First though a note on sneakers.
In the late winter into about July I went on a non-stability shoe spree. I purchased a pair of Nike Vomeros, Nike Pegasus Turbo 2's, the latter was to be used at Shamrock 2020. Obviously that didn't happen. Those sneakers weren't used very much and still sit most of the time. Why? Because they offer no stability at all. I can watch my leg collapse inward with each step (left foot). Even the insert was not helpful.
The Vomeros were not as bad but they are heavy. I also needed to put the insert in to stabilize my left foot. That sneaker was good. I say was because it's worn now at well over 300 miles AND I can tell that the soles no longer cushion like they did before.
In late spring i purchased a pair of Adidas Boston 8s. Ooooh nice. Light shoe with a very low profile. Not a lot of cushion but very fast shoe indeed. Best thing was that I didn't need my insert. I think the low profile had a lot to do with it as there wasn't a lot of material to squish. Speaking of squish...
So I purchased a pair of SL20s since I liked to Boston's so much. Big mistake. I hadn't even gotten to 75 miles when I had to retire them from running due to pain in my left leg. I now use them for walking. I'm glad these weren't some $200 shoe.
So with the weather changing and knowing I cannot use the Boston's for everything and my Vomeros being beat, I decided to go back to my trusty Saucony's and purchased a pair of Guide 13s.
They. Are. Nice.
My legs are happy. They put a piece of plastic under the arch. There is no collapsing of my foot. At all. Clearly I need to be on stability shoes. My little experiment with non-stability shoes for every day running is done. Now, It'll be Saucony's for daily MAF running and long runs. Boston's for track speed work or short distance speed work (5 and 10K) and the Pegs for races. Maybe.
Which brings us to the second topic of this update: MAF training. Last Feb I noted that my street MAF was 8;17/mile (a month out from the expected race). Today I run that at 7:58 with many sections in the low 7s and hitting upper 6s.
I'll hopefully get to do a track session while temps are in the 50s and see where I am there. My intention now is to drop my heart rate by maybe 5 BPM over the winter for MAF runs to see what improvements I can make over the next 6 months.
I think I'm going to have a great PR in 2021. Here's to hoping.
Friday, August 14, 2020
SL 20s: The Knee Killer
So I wrote that due to the wet feet in the Boston 8's that I got a pair of SL20s which were more breathable. Indeed they were. Instead of soaked feet I had damp feet. As fate would have it, to make up for the lack of soppiness, these sneakers decided to try to kill my knees.
After a few runs I noticed that the inside tendon on my left knee was sore. My left foot is the "bad" foot. I figured it was due to not using my insert (which I haven't needed in the Boston). I put the insert in and continued to run. Same deal except now I ALSO had knee knock. That is, on occasion my knees were meeting. That doesn't happen to me and I don't have knock knees. This meant that my foot was collapsing inward and that was likely the cause of my tendon pain.
Looking at the bottom of the sneaker I saw that the inner edge of the front of the sneaker was very worn. This is with 70 miles. Clearly my foot was doing a lot of rolling.
The SL20s have been retired to walk duty...whenever I wear white. Had I paid full freight for these sneakers I would have been very upset. I didn't so I'm only a little upset. Even the Pegs with a similar mileage (I use it for occasional long run speed tests) weren't that worn.
It goes to show that you have to listen to your body and examine your shoes to make sure you're not headed to injury. I did notice that the SLs moved around more than the Bostons. That should have been a clue.
Your mileage may certainly vary but that's the last SL I'll be purchasing. Fortunately the weather will soon be cooling down and I'll be back to thicker sneakers. So I'll have to find a pair of Vomeros. They are heavy but handled cold weather well, heel wear issue aside.


